If a single wallet holds a large share of supply, that holder's decision to sell matters more than everything else combined. Here is how to read distribution.
Holder concentration measures how much of a token's supply sits in the largest wallets. A token where one address holds 40% is a different proposition from one where the largest holder has 2%, even if every other number matches.
The relevant comparison is not concentration on its own but concentration against pool depth: what happens if that holder sells into this pool?
A single large holder is an overhang. Their exit is not one trade among many; on a thin pool it is the market. Everyone else's position is effectively subordinate to one person's decision.
Concentration is also frequently disguised. Supply split across ten wallets controlled by one person looks decentralised in every automated check. Distribution data tells you what the chain records, not who controls what.
Some concentration is structural and benign — locked team allocations, treasury addresses, bridge contracts, the liquidity pool itself. A top-holder figure that includes the pool contract is measuring the wrong thing.
This is the actual curve used to score holder concentration on every token page and in the risk tool. Scores run 0 to 100, where higher means more risk.
| Measured value | Band | Component score |
|---|---|---|
| 2% | Low | 10/100 |
| 5% | Moderate | 25/100 |
| 15% | Elevated | 55/100 |
| 30% | High | 80/100 |
| 50% | Severe | 95/100 |
| 80% | Severe | 100/100 |
Nothing here is financial advice. A low score means the measurable indicators look unremarkable; it does not mean a token is safe. See how this site works.